“India is a Democratic country”. Well how many of us can stand up and say that india is a Democratic country, it would be better to say that either indians pretend to be democratic or they wearing a mask of democracy. This is what i think; my statement is also supported by the reknown writer Arundhati Roy, the author of The God of Small Things told the 1,000-strong audience at a book reading funstion she attended along with Eduardo Galeano, one of Latin America’s most distinguished writers.
With her aggressive speech, Roy, the 1997 Booker winner, dominated the event with Galeano playing second fiddle.
She surprised the jampacked Town Hall as she stopped reading The God of Small Things midway and said she wanted to speak on an issue, which had been bothering her for quite some time.
She said she was confused, as India was passing through a terrible time.
Amidst frequent clapping, she blasted the Indian government and the Bush administration. She did not spare even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. ‘‘There is no real democracy in India. Several states in India are on the verge of civil war,’’ she said.
Challenging the much-acclaimed views of columnist Thomson Friedman praising India, a democracy of a billion population, for conducting peaceful elections year after year, she said, ‘‘He probably needs a new tour of India… Does Thomas know that in Kashmir Valley alone, some 80,000 people have been killed? In Iraq, there are 1,50,000 military personnel, whereas in Kashmir Valley there are some 7,00,000.’’
Referring to the visit of President George Bush to New Delhi in March, she said, without elaborating: ‘‘Bush visit was the most humiliating experience of my life.’’ As the venue for Bush’s address changed from Parliament to Vigyan Bhawan to Metro Park, he finally ended up addressing India from a Zoo. ‘‘I am not joking. This is reality and the giraffes were disappointed,’’ she said amidst laughter from the audience.
She did not agree with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s views in his lecture at the Oxford University praising Britain for all the good things that India has, like its democracy, judiciary and bureaucracy. India, she said, was a free market meant to steal from the poor and subsidise the rich.
Later, during her dialogue with Galeano, she urged the Americans to oppose the occupation of Iraq by the US and allied forces. She said Iraq and Afghanistan were not the only nations occupied by the US. The others were controlled by checks and public diplomacy, she said. The audience gave her a standing ovation.
Well, Well….. this was just to take you the point where i want you all people to think and have your view. I think the one reading this page is much aware of Narendra Modi Led Godhra Carnage, he is Denying the allegations as such the moron is very much innocent.
All thanks to Aaj Tak led sting operation. But there are still some facts whihc the channel need’s to question and should point out, as such 1. Why there hacve been no arrest till date? 2. Where have all these politician’s vanished? 3.Where are the police official who helped thier won time of fireplays?, My opinion “They are searching if they can blame all of this on pakistan”. Lets go to that day where al of this started.
The 2002 Gujarat violence took place in the State of Gujarat, India involving communal violence between Hindus and Muslims.
The official estimates of the death toll given to the parliament on May 11, 2005 by the Manmohan Singh government and based on Gujarat government statistics, are 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus dead, 223 missing and 2,548 injured. The report placed the number of riot widows at 919 and 606 children were declared orphaned. There are human rights groups which believed that the death tolls were higher, in the upwards of 1000 and up to 2000. The United States Congressional Research Service also places the figure at “up to 2000, mostly Muslim”. Tens of thousands were displaced from their homes because of the violence. Only after the violence subsided in the month of May did a significant fraction of the displaced returned to the affected regions.
The then ruling BJP party maintained that this was in retaliation for the burning to death, on February 27, 2002 of 58 Hindu pilgrims, mostly women and children, by a Muslim mob. This attack also resulted in the injury of 43 Hindus.
Several international news media agencies, governments, non-governmental organizations and human rights advocacy groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have reported on the riots. Some of them have referred to the incidents as a “massacre”. They have also been critical of the Gujarat government’s responses, to the point of alleging it’s complicity in the riots. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch further criticize the Indian government for failure to address the resulting humanitarian condition of people, “overwhelming majority of them Muslim”,who fled their homes for relief camps in the aftermath of the event. In turn, some have accused these news media agencies, non-governmental organizations and human rights advocacy groups of media bias and bias against Hindus.
Godhra train burning
Fifty eight people, including 25 women and 15 children were burnt alive in a train coach at Godhra Station during an altercation between Kar Sevaks on board the train and local Muslims.Initial media reports blamed the Muslim protesters for setting the coach on fire, in what Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Giriraj Kishore alleged was a “pre-planned” attack.The images from the train burning were broadcast in print as well as the electronic media, especially in local Gujarati language newspapers.The bodies of those killed in the train were brought to Ahmedabad, where a funeral procession was held, a move seen as a major provocation for the ensuing communal violence.The timings of the arrival of the dead bodies to the state capital Gandhinagar were advertised on the radio may have contributed to a very large turnout of people in an already charged atmosphere.[citation needed] The Vishwa Hindu Parishad issued a call for a state-wide strike on February 28, 2002. That strike was later supported by the ruling BJP government.Post Godhra violence
About fifteen or sixteen of the state’s 25 districts were affected by the post-Godhra violence, which was particularly severe in about five or six. The violence raged largely between February 28 and March 3, and after a drop, restarted on March 15, continuing till mid June.The first incidents of attacks on the minority Muslim community started at Ahmedabad, where Hindus began throwing stones at and later burned a Muslim housing complex known as Gulburg Society, and then spread elsewhere. The initial violence was believed to be instigated by unsubstantiated rumours, endorsed by a senior VHP leader, of Muslims having kidnapped three Hindu girls during the Godhra train attack. Thirty three towns of the state were severely affected and had to be placed under curfew at one point or another during this period. According to allegations made by Human Rights Watchs report compiled by Smita Narula, Muslim monuments like mosques and tombs were demolished,and at some places temples erected over them. U.K newspaper “The Guardian” reported that “two hundred and thirty different Islamic monuments, including a 400-year-old mosque were destroyed or vandalized” which “Right-wing Hindu scholars justified saying that India’s Muslim Emperors had demolished Hindu temples to build mosques”, so the gangs who tore down the Muslim shrines were merely “redeeming the past”.Attacks on MuslimsIn Naroda, according to Human Rights Watch, at least 65 Muslims were killed, many of them women who were sexually assaulted by violent mobs. One of the witnesses stated before the Nanavati commission that that BJP leader Maya Kodnani, Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi and others had allegedly led mobs on February 28 last year in the Naroda-Patia area.A high profile case involved an Ex-Congress MP who was surrounded by Hindu Mobs (including Congress workers) while many other Muslim residents in the area took shelter in his compound. Ehsaan was believed to have contacted the local police stations, MPs of the area as well as the Chief Minister Modi to save the people from the ever increasing mob. However, no police reinforcement had reached his place and few policemen present were ineffective and unwilling to control the violent mob.” Eventually he was burnt to death, along with fifty others.According to HRW in its widely-quoted report, mobs of “thousands” (including people from “secular” parties), dressed in “saffron scarves and khaki shorts” – the signature uniform of the RSS – and “armed with swords, sophisticated explosives, and gas cylinders”, were guided by voter lists and printouts of addresses of Muslim-owned properties, information obtained from the local municipal administration. The report further charged that in some cases members of the state police force “led” the mobs, “aiming and firing at every Muslim who got in the way”, or instead of offering assistance “led the victims directly into the hands of their killers”. Calls for assistance to the police, fire brigades, and even ambulance services generally proved futile.Best Bakery
Fourteen people, including women and children, were killed by a mob at the Best Bakery in the town of Vadodara on the night of 1 March. The ensuing murder trial received wide attention after witnesses retracted testimony in court and all accused were acquitted. The Indian Supreme Court, acting on a petition by social activist Teesta Setalvad, ordered a retrial outside Gujarat in which nine accused were found guilty in 2006. A key witness, Zaheera Sheikh, who repeatedly changed her testimony during the trials and the petition was found guilty of perjury.
Attacks on Hindus
Attacks on Hindus by Muslim mobs in Danilimda, Modasa, Himmatnagar, Bharuch, Sindhi Market, Bhanderi Pole, and other localities in the city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat were perpetrated by Muslim mobs. The attacks have been described as “retaliatory” by Human Rights Watch. There was significant loss of life and property. and many Hindu Dalits were rendered homeless.The attacks on the Dalit community were particularly severe. Among the more significant attacks was the one in Khariwadi of Shahpura slum. The Muslim manager of a nearby hotel rallied a group of Muslim youths and set the houses of the Dalits on fire, first taking care to remove all inhabitants of the Muslim houses to a safe place 35 Hindu families had their houses burnt down, and two girls were burnt alive. Asylum was provided to the Hindus by a Sindhi hotelier. Similar attacks were recorded against Dalits by Muslim mobs armed with swords in Behrampura. The attacks on Dalits have largely been ignored by the “secular” politicians, and several Hindu Nationalist organizations such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Bajrang Dal came to their aid.A BJP member and municipal corporator testified before the Nanavati-Shah commission that Muslims in the Amraiwadi area unfurled the Pakistani flag and raised pro-Pakistan slogans ten days after the Godhra riots, accompanied by cries demanding that “Kaffirs” be killed and their houses emptied. He said that attacks on Hindus were continuing in the area and claimed that riots were triggered after Muslims instigated them “with an intention of spreading fear”.In September 2002, at least 29 people were killed when suspected Islamic fundamentalist gunmen engaged in the Akshardham Temple attack in the city of Gandhinagar in Gujarat. The Pakistani ISI and terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba were accused of supporting the terrorists, but they have denied this accusation.
Over ten thousand Hindus were made homeless as a result of the Gujarat violence. In several residential areas, including Mahajan No Vando, Hindus were targeted following calls for retaliation. After looting the Hindu homes, the threw kerosene on the roofs and ignited their houses. According to one Hindu who lived through the violence.
In the morning the mosques began announcing that Islam was in danger, that there was poison in the milk. This is their code word. We are the only Hindus here, poison here means us. The rioting lasted between 2:15 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.
Many Hindus fortified their residential areas and did not leave them to go to work, following a young man being killed on the way to work by Muslim mobs.
In August 2002 a plot by Lashkar-e-Toiba to assassinate Narendra Modi, Praveen Togadia, and other Sangh Parivar leaders was unearthed by Indian police. Delhi Police Special Commissioner K. K. Paul noted their motive was to take “Revenge for the injustice caused to muslims in Gujrat”.
Role of government and police
The Modi led state government was reprimanded at various levels including the Parliament, Supreme Court and internationally. The upper house of the Indian parliament unanimously passed a resolution calling for federal intervention in Gujarat, after a similar censure motion in the lower house was defeated by about 100 votes. The Indian Supreme Court has been strongly critical of the state government’s investigation and prosecution of those accused of violence during the riots.According to New York Times reporter Celia Dugger, witnesses were “dismayed by the lack of intervention from local police”, who often “watched the events taking place and took no action against the attacks on Muslims and their property”.Hindu residents of Mahajan No Vando, part of the Muslim dominated area of Jamalpur, told HRW that on March 1, the police ignored phone calls and left them fend for themselves when a Muslim mob attacked. Numerous calls by Hindus throughout the riots were reportedly ignored by the police.The United States Department of State in its International Religious Freedom Report 2003 stated:
| “ |
The Gujarat state government and the police were criticized for failing to stop the violence, and in some cases participating in or encouraging it. NGOs report that police were implicated directly in nearly all the attacks against Muslims in Gujarat, and in some cases, NGOs contend, police officials encouraged the mob. The Government dispatched the NHRC to investigate the attacks against Muslims, but the NHRC’s findings that the attacks against Muslims “was a comprehensive failure on the part of the state government to control the persistent violation of rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the people of the state,” led to widespread criticism in the Hindu community and allegations of government partiality. |
” |
Amnesty International’s annual report on India in 2003 claimed the “Gujarat government did not actively fulfill its duty to provide appropriate relief and rehabilitation to the survivors”. IT also claimed that “the same police force that was accused of colluding with the attackers was put in charge of the investigations into the massacres, undermining the process of delivery of justice to the victims.”
In 2003, A comment by G.T. Nanavati, who leads the official commission investigating the riots, that part of the evidence collected and reviewed till then did not indicate any serious lapse on the part of the government or police in Gujarat was criticised as inappropriate by aid and reconciliation activists and other jurists.
One thousand army troops were flown in by the evening of March 1 to restore order. Intelligence officials alleged that the deployment was deliberately delayed by the state and central governments. On May 3, former Punjab police chief K P S Gill was appointed as security adviser to the Chief Minister.
In response to allegations of state involvement, Gujarat government spokesman, Bharat Pandya, told the BBC that the rioting was a spontaneous Hindu backlash fuelled by widespread anger against Muslims. He said “Hindus are frustrated over the role of Muslims in the on-going violence in Indian-administered Kashmir and other parts of India”.
RB Sreekumar, who served as Gujarat’s intelligence chief during the riots, alleged that the state government issued “unconstitutional directives”, with officials asking him to kill Muslims involved in rioting or disrupting a Hindu religious event. The Gujarat government denied the allegations, calling them “baseless” and instigated out of malice because Mr. Sreekumar was not promoted.
Human Rights Watch alleges that state enforcement and state machinery continues to “harass and intimidate” key witnesses, NGOs, social activists and lawyers who are fighting to seek justice for riot victims.
The US Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom, John Hanford, expressed concern over religious intolerance in Indian politics, said that while the rioters may have been aided by state and local officials, “we don’t believe that the Central Government even under the BJP Government was involved in inciting those riots.”
Responses
The BJP government has defended the actions of Narendra Modi’s administration against charges of ‘genocide’. They said that the killing of 254 Hindus, mostly in police firing, indicates how the state authorities took effective steps to curb the violence. In a written reply to the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Home Affairs Sriprakash Jaiswal confirmed the Hindu death toll in the incident(s).BJP MP and journalist Balbir Punj disputed allegations of bias against Muslims by the BJP-run state government, pointing out that the majority of the arrestees during and after the riots were Hindus.Role of Hindu nationalist organisationsSome independent reports have blamed the Sangh Parivar organisations to be responsible for orchestrating the riots. These organisations include the RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal and affiliated organisations. The adult victims of the Godhra train burning were pilgrims and some may have been members of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad.Muslims in Ahmedabad alleged that there were elements of planning in the violence. Human Rights Watch alleges that they also had detailed about buildings and businesses held by members of the minority community while there were also cases where Hindus living in mixed neighbourhood were attacked and driven out of their homes.The People’s Union for Civil Liberties allege that pamphlets were in circulation by the Sangh Parivar which could have ignited the violence further. They also alleged that there are “elements of economic boycott” against the Muslim community in most areas of Gujarat.Shortly after the riots, when most Muslims were still in relief camps, a leaflet campaign “urging Hindus to boycott Muslim-owned shops and other establishments” was widely reported. The leaflets urged the Hindu reader not to frequent Muslim-owned restaurants, work in Muslim-run offices, hire Muslims or see films starring Muslim actors; they further assured the reader that the boycott would “throttle these elements. It will break their backbone. Then it will be difficult for them to live in any corner of this country.” The economic boycott and “pressure from Hindu radicals” caused fewer employers to re-hire returning Muslims. No group claimed direct responsibility for the leaflets but a senior official of Viswha Hindu Parishad (VHP) was quoted as saying he was “in complete agreement with whatever is propagated through them.”
As a consequence of the leaflet campaign, observers claimed that ten months, a year and even two and half years later, the economic boycott of Muslims was still severe in many parts of the state. As a consequence of the boycott and continued threats, relief organisations lamented that they were having to build “ghettoes” for the displaced.
Public enquiries
On March 6, the Gujarat government set up a commission of enquiry headed by retired High Court judge K.G. Shah to enquire into the Godhra train burning and the subsequent violence and submit a report in three months. Following criticism from victims’ organisations, activists and political parties over Shah’s alleged proximity to the BJP, on May 22, the government reconstituted the commission, appointing retired Supreme Court Justice G.T. Nanavati to lead the commission.
- National Human Rights Commission
In its Proceedings of 1 April 2002, the Commission had set out its Preliminary Comments and Recommendations on the situation and sent a Confidential Report of the team of the Commission that visited Gujarat from 19 March-22 March 2002 to Gujarat government and Central Home Ministry. The Gujarat government in its reply did not provide its response to the Confidential report. Therefore, the Commission was compelled to release the confidential report in its entirety and observed that nothing in the reports received in response “rebuts the presumption that the Modi administration failed in its duty to protect the rights of the people of Gujarat” by not exercising its jurisdiction over non-state players that may cause or facilitate the violation of human rights.It further observed that “the violence in the State, which was initially claimed to have been brought under control in seventy two hours, persisted in varying degree for over two months, the toll in death and destruction rising with the passage of time despite the measures reportedly taken by the State Government”.The report claims failure of intelligence, failure to take appropriate action, patterns of arrests, uneven handling of major cases, and “Distorted FIRs: ‘extraneous influences’, issue of transparency and integrity” as key factors in the incident(s).
In September 2004, a panel appointed by the central government and headed by former Supreme Court judge UC Banerjee to probe the Godhra train fire concluded that the fire was accidental. Its findings were challenged by the BJP and the Gujarat inspector-general of police. In October 2006, the Gujarat High Court ruled that the panel was set up illegally, in violation of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 which prohibits the setting up of separate commissions by state and central governments to probe a matter of public importance.
Aftermath
Opposition parties as well as three coalition partners of the BJP-led central government demanded the dismissal of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi for failing to contain the violence, with some calling for the removal of Union Home Minister L K Advani as well.On July 18, the Modi government stepped down, dissolving the state assembly and calling for snap elections. The Indian Election Commission ruled out early elections, citing the prevailing law and order situation, a decision the union government unsuccessfully[ appealed against in the Supreme Court.Elections were held in December and Modi was returned to power in a landslide victory.
Relief efforts
The Indian government's compensation policies offered 200,000 rupees for families with dead members on the train and 100,000 rupees for families who had relatives die in the riots. According to Celia Dugger of the New York Times, it has been called discriminatory by Muslims as all of the train burning victims were Hindus and about 75% of the riot victims were Muslims.By March 27, nearly 100,000 displaced people moved into 101 relief camps. This swelled to over 150,000 in 104 camps the next two weeks. The camps were run by community groups and NGOs, with the government committing to provide amenities an supplementary services. Drinking water, medical help, clothing and blankets were in short supply at the camps. At least another 100 camps were denied government support, according to a camp organiser. and relief supplies were prevented from reaching the camps over fears that they may be carrying arms.Relief camp organisers alleged that the state government was coercing refugees to leave relief camps, with 25,000 people made to leave eighteen camps that were shut down. Following government assurances that camps would not be shut down, the Gujarat High Court bench ordered that camp organisers be given a supervisory role to ensure that the assurances were met.
Media coverage
Covering the first major communal riots following in the advent of satellite television to India, news channels set a precedent by identifying the community of those involved in the violence, breaking a long-standing practice.The Gujarat government banned television news channels critical of the government's response. STAR News, Zee News, Aaj Tak, CNN as well as local stations were blocked.
Critical reporting on the Gujarat government's handling of the situation helped bring about the Indian government's intervention in controlling the violence.
Allegations have been made of deliberately loading the reports against Hindus and whitewashing the violence perpetrated by Muslims. The media, as well as several opinion makers, have been criticized for ignoring the causal connection between rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of the country and the resulting frustration of Hindus that led to the riots and falsely attacking Hindus as the sole cause and the sole perpetrators of the violence. Jayalalithaa Jayaram, general secretary of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, also criticized the media and politicians for bias, saying "it is saddening and strange that when such acts are perpetrated against the minorities all political leaders rush to condemn. But when the majority is attacked, not a single political leader condemns it."
Controversies on the riots
A group from the Editorial Guild of India rejected the charge that the graphic news coverage aggravated the situation, saying that the coverage exposed the "horrors" of the riots as well as the "supine if not complicit" attitude of the state, helping propel remedial action. The team also faulted Gujarati language papers Gujarat Samachar and the pro-Hindutva Sandesh of distorted and provocative reporting.[97]
Columnist Rajeev Srinivasan of Rediff.com accused “the self-proclaimed ‘intelligentsia’” of attempting to “mislead the public with its biased and one-sided perorations”.[101][102] He says that there is a decidedly Marxist,”Nehruvian” and anti-Hindu bias in the intelligentsia in India that leads them to believe that Hindu lives are “less valuable” than Muslim lives. This leads them to ignore the atrocities perpetrated by Islamic Fundamentalists against Hindus, as well as the Godhra Train Burning that precipitated the riots, and deflect attention away from them by focusing on the actions of the Hindus.[101][102] The Godhra incident, however, received extensive news coverage until it was overtaken by the subsequent violence and the presentation of the Union budget.[97]
BJP MP Balbir Punj has criticised an Arundhati Roy essay, pointing out a factual error in it, and accusing a “secular pack” in the media of hyperbole and sensationalising the riots as part of an agenda of what he calls ‘defamation’ and ‘left wing anti-India propaganda’ [103][104]. Punj writes “She (Roy) terms Gujarat the ‘petri dish’ of the Sangh Parivar. The fact is that Godhra has been used as a crucible by the secular fundamentalists.” Punj later continues, “Loss of 900-odd innocent lives (both Hindus and Muslims) is definitely not a ‘genocide’ of any one community”. Punj also says, “The secular pack is not only guilty of parading half-truths but also of condoning and inciting violence”.
Controversies on the riots
- Allegations of atrocities against women
There has been widespread public outrage regarding atrocities against women during the riots, including acts of rape, in respect of which FIRs were allegedly neither promptly nor accurately recorded, and the victims allegedly harassed and intimidated.An international “fact finding committee” formed of experts from US, UK, France, Germany and Sri Lanka claimed that “Sexual violence was being used as a strategy for terrorising women belonging to minority community in the state.
Taking a stand decried by the media and other rights group, the National Commission for Women accused organisations and the media of needlessly exaggerating the plight of women victims of the riots. Nafisa Hussain, a member of the NCW, went on record saying that several organisations and the media have needlessly blown out of proportion the violence suffered by minority women in the communal riots of Gujarat. Other groups have challenged the stand of the NCW.The newspaper Tribune reported that “The National Commission for Women has reluctantly agreed to the complicity of Gujarat Government in the communal violence in the state.” The tone of their most recent report was reported by the Tribune as “lenient”.
Sources
Notes
- ^ Gujarat riot death toll revealed,BBC
- ^ BJP cites govt statistics to defend Modi,Indian Express
- ^ 254 Hindus, 790 Muslims killed in post-Godhra riots,Indiainfo.com
- ^ “Talibanization” and “Saffronization” in India,hir.harvard.edu
- ^ Why is Narendra Modi in Wembley?,The Guardian
- ^ India Shining, Communal Darkness,pucl.org
- ^ India’s Calculated Ethnic Violence
- ^ Communal violence and nuclear stand-off
- ^ India in crisis
- ^ India-U.S. Relations
- ^ Taking revenge in Gujarat,CNN
- ^ Train Carrying Hindus Set Afire by Muslim Mob in India,ict.org
- ^ Gujarat Officials Took Part in Anti-Muslim Violence -Human Rights Watch
- ^ Hours of Anti-India, Anti-Hindutva Rhetoric at “Indian” Muslim Meet, bu Yatindra Bhatnagar,International Opinion
- ^ Politics By Other Means: An Analysis of Human Rights Watch Reports on India,saag.org
- ^ What’s the Hindu bias in that?! by Varsha Bhosle, Rediff.com
- ^ Old habits die hard
- ^ Massacres in Godhra and Ahmedabad. Human Rights Watch (April 2002).
- ^ Varadarajan, Siddharth. “The truth about Godhra“, The Hindu, Jan 23, 2005.
- ^ “Call for calm after Indian train attack“, CNN, February 27, 2002. “Scores killed in India train attack“, BBC News Online, 27 February, 2002. “Shoot-at-sight orders, curfew in Godhra“, Times of India, 27 Feb 2002.
- ^ “70 killed, Army on stand by“, Express India, February 28, 2002.
- ^ “Don’t test patience of Hindus: VHP“, Rediff News, February 28, 2002.
- ^ Sevanti Ninan. “An ounce of image, a pound of performance“, The Hindu, Apr 28, 2002.
- ^ “Godhra panel: Plea to summon Modi“, Deccan Herald, September 1, 2007.
- ^ “Modi wanted Godhra bodies to come to A’bad“, Times of India, 22 Aug 2004.
- ^ “VHP-sponsored bandh begins in Gujarat; one killed in Baroda“, Rediff News, February 28, 2002.
- ^ a b Paul R. Brass (2005). The Production Of Hindu-muslim Violence In Contemporary India. University of Washington Press, 385-393. ISBN 0295985062.
- ^ a b Dugger, Celia W. 200 Are Dead In 3-Day Riot Of Revenge In West India New York Times. New York, N.Y.:2 March 2002. p. A1
- ^ [1]
- ^ a b [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ Riot witness names MLA
- ^ National Human Rights Commission report
- ^ a b c Police officials led Hindu attackers: HRW report on Muslims’ massacre in Gujarat, Dawn, April 30, 2002
- ^ Gujarat state fails to protect women from violence
- ^ Dionne Bunsha, Verdict in Best Bakery case, Frontline, Volume 23 – Issue 04, Feb. 25 – Mar. 10, 2006
- ^ Why did Zaheera Sheikh have to lie?,Rediff.com
- ^ a b c d e f g Attacks on Hindus,Human Rights Watch
- ^ Riots hit all classes, people of all faith
- ^ A home for long now just a death trap
- ^ With no relief, they turn to religious places for shelter,Indian Express
- ^ a b Dalits suffered heavily during Gujarat riots by Prof. Suvarna Raval.Dalithumenrights.com archive of Mumbai Tarun Bharat
- ^ a b Cache of DHR
- ^ Pak flag was hoisted after Godhra carnage: witness,Rediff.com
- ^ Lashkar responsible for temple attack,Rediff.com
- ^ Gunmen Attack Hindu Temple in Gujarat,ict.org
- ^ NSG commandos rush to Gandhinagar
- ^ ISI instigated Akshardham attack: Gujarat police,Rediff.com
- ^ Plan to kill Modi, Togadia unearthed; 3 held Rediff – August 30, 2002
- ^ “Indian MPs back Gujarat motion“, BBC News Online, 6 May, 2002.
- ^ “Court orders Gujarat riot review“, BBC News Online, 17 August, 2004.
- ^ Dugger, Celia W. Hindu Rioters Kill 60 Muslims in India New York Times. New York, N.Y.:1 March 2002.
- ^ International Religious Freedom Report 2003. By the United States Department of State. Retrieved on April 19, 2007.
- ^ India Amnesty International
- ^ No police lapse in Gujarat riots: Justice Nanavati Rediff – May 18, 2003
- ^ “Godhra probe: No evidence of lapse against govt“, Times of India, 19 May 2003.
- ^ “3 organisations withdraw from Godhra hearings“, Times of India, 16 Jun 2003.
- ^ “I didn’t say so, says Nanavati“, Indian Express, May 19, 2003.
- ^ Rahul Bedi. “Soldiers ‘held back to allow Hindus revenge’“, The Telegraph, 04/03/2002.
- ^ “Gill is Modi’s Security Adviser“, The Tribune, May 2, 2002.
- ^ NGO says Gujarat riots were planned
- ^ BBC UK Website
- ^ [4]
- ^ [5]
- ^ Sridhar Krishnaswami. “U.S. raised Gujarat riots with BJP-led Government“, The Hindu, Sep 16, 2004.
- ^ BJP cites govt statistics to defend Modi
- ^ a b Truth in Gujarat by Balbir Punj
- ^ Rediff.com
- ^ We have no orders to save you!
- ^ precise knowledge ExpressIndia.com
- ^ [6]
- ^ An Interim Report to the National Human Rights commission People’s Union for Civil Liberties
- ^ a b c “Drive for boycott of Gujarat Muslims“, Dawn, March 22, 2002
- ^ a b “Sectarian Violence Haunts Indian City; Hindu Militants Bar Muslims From Work”, by Rama Lakshmi, Washington Post, April 8, 2002
- ^ [7]
- ^ [8]
- ^ [9]
- ^ [10]
- ^ [11]
- ^ [12][13][14]
- ^ [15]
- ^ “India train fire ‘not mob attack’“, BBC News Online, 17 January, 2005.
- ^ Press Trust of India. “Banerjee panel illegal: Gujarat HC“, Express India, October 13, 2006.
- ^ “HC terms Sabarmati Express panel illegal“, Financial Express, October 14, 2006.
- ^ KHOZEM MERCHANT. “Hindu hardliners rally round Gujarat leader“, Financial Times, Apr 12, 2002.
- ^ “Removal of Advani, Modi sought“, The Hindu, Mar 07, 2002.
- ^ “Gujarat chief minister resigns“, BBC News Online, 19 July, 2002.
- ^ AMY WALDMAN. “2 Indian Elections Bring Vote Panel’s Chief to Fore“, New York Times, September 7, 2002.
- ^ Mark Tully. “India’s electoral process in question“, CNN, August 27, 2002.
- ^ “Gujarat victory heartens nationalists“, BBC News Online, 15 December.
- ^ 254 Hindus, 790 Muslims killed in post-Godhra riots
- ^ Dugger, Celia W. Ahmedabad Journal – In India, a Child’s Life Is Cheap Indeed New York Times. New York, N.Y.:7 March 2002.
- ^ Ruchir Chandorkar. “Rains, epidemic threaten relief camps“, Times of India, 2 Jul 2002.
- ^ Priyanka Kakodkar. “Camp Comatose“, Outlook, Apr 15, 2002.
- ^ NGO says Gujarat riots were planned
- ^ “Govt not to close relief camps“, Times of India, 27 Jun 2002.
- ^ a b c d e Sonwalkar, Prasun (2006), “Shooting the messenger? Political violence, Gujarat 2002 and the Indian news media”, in Cole, Benjamin, Conflict, Terrorism and the Media in Asia, Routledge, pp. 82-97, 0415351987
- ^ Why I Refuse to Condemn Post-Godhra Riots
- ^ Madam, will they be shamed by your blunt words?,New India Press
- ^ Why ’secular’ history repeats itself,Rediff.com
- ^ a b After the carnage: the predatory ‘intelligentsia’
- ^ a b Blaming the Hindu Victim: Manufacturing Consent for Barbarism
- ^ Fiddling with facts as Gujarat Burns,Outlook India
- ^ Fiddling With Facts As Gujarat Burns, HVK archive of Outlook India
- ^ Intl experts spoil Modi’s party, say Gujarat worse than Bosnia
- ^ Womens groups decry NCW stand
- ^ Web-archive of above, from tehelka.com
- ^ Gujarat’s women were victims of extreme violence
- ^ NCM rejects Gujarat report:Directs state to follow its recommendations
External links
- Harsh Mander Cry, the Beloved Country: Reflections on the Gujarat Massacre.
- Democracy: Who is she when she’s at home? by Arundhati Roy
- Fiddling with Facts as Gujarat Burns – Balbir Punj
- Destruction of Gujarat’s Muslim heritage
- The full story of Kauser Bano
- Truth in Gujarat by Balbir Punj
- Godhra train fire conspiracy theory bogus, says counsel
- Lalu panel calls Godhra an accident, what about flaming rags, ask victims
- Godhra train carnage survivor says he heard blast
- “We Have No Orders To Save You”:State Participation and Complicity in Communal Violence in Gujarat- Human Rights Watch Report
- Politics By Other Means: An Analysis of Human Rights Watch Reports on India – Criticism of Human Rights Watch Report, Guest column for the South Asia Analysis Group
- The Hindu filmmaker Rakesh Sharma’s documentary India: Final Solution portrays the nature and the milieu of the Gujarat Riots of 2002, playing the incident as instigated by Hindu ultranationalists, and perpetrated against innocent Muslim families. The film also provides background on the preceding Godhra massacre.Interview with Rakesh Sharma. BBC profile of India: Final Solution
- Foreign missions: undiplomatic leaks – Allegations of anti-India media bias
- Time Cover Story on Gujarat Riots
- Pictures of Gujarat Riots
- Gujarat: Riots and Politics, Outlook dossier.
- Gujarat Riots, Indian Express full coverage
- The Gujarat Riots, Rediff News
- Gujarat Riots: The Aftermath, Hindustan Times
